@Rarebear Whether it is through String Theory of Strong Anthropic Theory I really have trouble buying the multiple universes. With Time travelers bopping back and launching new universe sin which other time travelers could bop back and lunch more universes, we would soon run into an infinity of universes. And since each universe must be completely undetectable from any other of the universes, I say that the Theory of Economy suggests we dispense with them till evidence shows one to exist.
@crisw But that takes us right back to the need for multiple universes if time travel occurs. Without multiple universes, in a fully deterministic Universe the boundary condition would never change, because the future me would have always come back to to the me of the past I chose to travel to, and would then always go right back to developing the time machine to do it again.
@ChazMaz That paradox is one that leads me to believe time travel is not going to be possible. That and the fact that time travelers from some distant future where the technology exists are not dropping in on us today. Some have suggested that the Universe conspires to make it impossible to set up a time paradox, but my reaction is why would the nascent universe have written laws of science to cover doing that?
@wundayatta Great points. But there are some posited methods of time travel that might make the classic sci-fi box type machine a possibility. Nothing more than wild postulates as we try to reconcile gravitation with the strong and weak force. But the hope is out there.
@iamthemob I don’t know what hope we have. I hope we have hope. I don’t know that the Universe is entirely deterministic. As @wundayatta noted, we haven’t yet established this. Certainly, macro structures act in an entirely deterministic fashion, but at the quantum level, things are quite different. We do not yet know whether they are truly stochastic, but they may be. And the activity that occurs in the human brain that amounts to thought relies on structures at the level of quantum mechanics. If that quantum uncertainty gives rise to an emergent I’ness” that can weigh facts, and either pick a rational direction or one that just satisfies the need for a lark, I would call that free will. How’s that for a long answer to a short question? :-)
@hobbitsubculture That brings up a fascinating question. Would the act of “going back” regress me to the me of today, before I invented my time machine. Or would the me of today exist alongside a me from many years in the future, an even more old and decrepit version of the me of today?