@Simone_De_Beauvoir I think you are reading the question wrong.
As I read it, the question is a bit about what rape is.
1) Does it require penetration?
2) Does it require vaginal penetration?
3) Does it require that the aggressor be the one penetrating?
4) Does it require that the aggressor be the one to penetrate the victims vagina?
I’ve been answering these questions from a legal point of view because thats what I know the most about (though I’m no expert).
It also makes sense to look at these questions because it helps you consider why you care about rape. Do we care about unwanted pregnancy? Do we care about emotional trauma? Do we care about the physical harm that comes as a result of rape? To some degree we care about all of these but for different people it will work out in different ways.
The definition of rape that is used in your link is something like “one person forcing another person into any sort of sexual action against their will.” This is a fine definition but again, legally thats not the definition (maybe the law should change, there’s some good arguments for this) and some people don’t think the trauma is as damaging to a man if a woman forces him into sexual action. In fact, you’d probably want evidence to support either point of view (though without evidence, I’d probably err on the side of saying being forced into anything causes trauma).
Anyway, my point is that depending on how you read the question, it probably isn’t asking “are women strong enough to rape men” but “given what rape means, is it even possible?”