I wouldn’t think so. Just as Darwin didn’t ‘change’ species or speciation itself, but only increased our understanding of what was already and had always been right in front of us, then Newton did the same thing with physics, and Einstein added ‘more understanding’. It doesn’t mean that any natural laws changed at any time, only our understanding did.
Same with quantum physics. I understand, without understanding ‘how’, that ‘simple observation’ can change results of physical experiments and outcomes. It doesn’t mean that any natural laws change to make that happen, it means that ‘there is another natural law’ to understand deeper, if we can.
So maybe a better way of expressing what I’m trying to get at is that there is a Darwinian process to science itself that leads to ‘more complex understandings* of what is already there’ replacing outmoded, simplistic or incomplete ideas.
* Or ‘more nearly complete’, even if not always more complex.