@woodcutter, is that really to the point? @chyna asked why there weren’t any questions asked. For most people, asking the same questions repeatedly does not solve the problem. Proposing the same solutions doesn’t solve the problem either. Until we know motivations, we don’t know what problem we are trying to solve.
Now it’s been several days, and Page has been identified as a white supremacist, and the media is all about using the information they are being fed by the Fed. Now, has the Fed identified a ‘Red car ‘or a ‘White car’ or ‘lack of training’ or the involvement of ‘liability insurance’? None of the above; they’ve only concluded that ‘car’ was involved and ‘training’ was involved. So the ‘car’ is Page, he was skilled with guns, the ‘training’, and the possible overarching of that is his involvement with white supremacists, the ‘liability insurance’. We still don’t know his motivation.
Without the motivation, how does anything change the fact that the Sikh Temple shooting would just be a re-hash of the Aurora Theater shooting? Do we have enough gun control laws? Do we have the right gun control laws? Should we have any gun control laws? Does everyone have access to the gun control laws? Really, these discussions simply disintegrate into people wanting “to go down in history being known for having tried to “do something about it” than really achieving positive results.”