You obviously have no understanding of canines and felines if you are willing to grossly generalize them all as mere “dogs and cats”.
Sure, you may like feeding your terrier and petting your black cat, but I bet you would not enjoy being torn apart by a dingo and a tiger.
Calling them cats and dogs is just a pathetic attempt to simplify the situation, with the hope of giving yourself an easier platform to debate from.
Sadly for you however, there are mountains of evidence and centuries of peer review study showing just how diverse the topic is.
Why are all big cats, such as tigers and lions immune to their version of AIDS? while domesticated versions of feline are usually still vulnerable?
Why don’t Manx cats have tails? are you including them in your over generalized definition too?
Did Shrodinger use a lion? I don’t think so.
There is no point in me trying to tell you what one I prefer, if you are going to force me answer under some kind of generalized false dichotomy of a fallacy, all in an attempt to pin me down and debate me on your uneducated level.
Go read a book.