Welcome to Fluther.
As important as each of those things may be (and they are not synonymous, by the way, not by any means), they pale in comparison to “communication”. And communication can be most simply defined as “getting one’s point across” (or if you’re on the receiving end “understanding the other’s message”). With respect to this question you have failed. Your question is ill-defined, as others have already noted, because we don’t know if you’re a student, a teacher, an administrator or director. We don’t know whether you’re asking about university-level schooling or some curriculum that is lower in its educational aspirations.
For that matter “good behavior” and “people skills” are somewhat meaningless terms. I’m told that Heinrich Himmler had pretty good manners and was sometimes fun at parties, and Hitler of course (not to bring Godwin’s Law into this discussion) obviously had a fair grasp of “people skills”. (It’s worth noting that many sociopaths display great “behavior” and “people skills” to groups of people, and only privately reveal themselves to their victims.)
It also depends on who is doing the evaluation. George Washington had a price on his head for “bad behavior” during the American Revolutionary War, but he is revered in this country quite explicitly for his “good behavior”.
So I’m still going with “communication” here, with an aim toward “understanding”. That applies to the listener as well, to “receive and acknowledge” communication and attempt to understand the message. Fortunately, Fluther is a pretty easy grader and you can repeat the test/s any number of times, so please do carry on.