He didn’t think that bringing a recording device, or or off, into a theater would raise eyebrows? I mean I wouldn’t expect to bring a camcorder into a theater and then say“it’s cool, I’ve got it turned off” when when the management turns out to not be cool with it. That fact that the story first claims that it was FBI, then later says “actually it was Homeland Security” (which seems fishy to me, since piracy of intellectual property is the FBI’s domain) when someone points out that the closest FBI offices were simply too far away for agents to arrive there in such a short amount of time. And the guy is supposedly in law enforcement himself, yet he stays for several hours for a “voluntary interview”, nor does he request an attorney during all this time? Really? Anyone in law enforcement should know better. Yeah, sorry, but the little things just don’t add up for me.