No. I lean toward indeterminism, exactly for the reason @ragingloli denies. If the macroscopic world is determined by some lower order of properties—in this case that of quanta and its seemingly probabilistic nature, then the macroscopic world is determined by an indeterministic system and must itself be indeterministic.
Radioactive decay is a classic example of this. One can know the rate of decay, but the atom which decays is literally random—it is not determined by any prior state.
Even if radioactive decay is the only indeterministic event in the entire universe to happen at a macroscopic level (I think there’s more than just that), it seems to me that this would still be enough to make our universe indeterministic. In other words, if the universe was somehow replayed from its inception, then different atoms would decay in the replay, and the universe would be different—the subtle changes could even accumulate in a sort of butterfly effect.
What some physicists and philosophers have debated over the last century or so, is whether the quantum realm is really indeterministic and statistical in nature, or whether there’s some hidden variables—that a more complete theory of quantum mechanics would result in QM being a deterministic theory. There has been no development in QM and no evidence to support this view.
This is an aside, but as far as I can tell, indeterminism does not imply free will. One could make a case for it, but I see many people just assume that it follows.