Yes, but…
In my tradition (Zen Buddhism) teachers have a very limited role. To build on what @Dan_Lyons said, it’s overtly recognized in Zen that there’s actually nothing to teach—nothing that a teacher can impart to a student that the student doesn’t already bring to the table, no truths that aren’t already on full display. As my teacher’s teacher used to say, “Being a Zen teacher is like selling water by the riverside”.
So the role of a Zen teacher isn’t at all what the question details imply: to “take the student beyond the physical into the spiritual”. One of our main stumbling blocks is the idea that there is some inherent division separating the “physical” and the “spiritual”. Another is the idea that there is somewhere else to get to, some better place that a teacher can help us reach. These (and plenty of others) are just ideas that keep us from seeing the way things are.
A Zen teacher’s job boils down to pointing out, over and over again, the obstructive ideas that we’ve latched onto along the way. No new ideas are offered to replace those old ones. None are needed. It’s when the student gets to the point of “no idea” that he can see the truth all by himself.