@DominicY Well, that kind of gets into a No True Scotsman thing because “Christian” is SO broad. There are some Christians who believe God loves all His children, and some who think God hates everyone except them, yet since both have accepted Jesus as their savior, both are “Christian”. One big difference between them though is that the latter group considers tolerance as heresy and thus won’t consider the “God loves us all!” crowd to be Christian. I mean, these are the same people that complain about Satanic brake lights so it really does a disservice to the rational Christians to be lumped in with that demographic.
But until the sane, moderate, all-loving Christians officially cut ties from their more radical brethren the same way Protestants and Catholics split centuries ago, or even just start really speaking out against the Fundamentalists, they will share the stigma of guilt by association. Of course, it would also cause political turmoil in Red states as law after law gets repealed due to being basically a Theocracy in many places, but c’est la vie.
And I still find it funny that Muslims generally know more about the Bible than those trying to make us a “Christian” nation. Then again, when one selectively edits out parts pertaining to charity, equality, or tolerance, then I suppose it stands to reason that you won’t know much about a book that mentions those things, especially not one that considers those qualities virtuous.