I guess it depends upon what your definition of atheist is.
If you feel being apathetic towards religion isn’t sufficient to qualify for atheist status, then you would likely disregard what he says.
Im a firm believer in allowing people to define themselves in whatever way they choose. If he says he was previously am atheist, I’m willing to take his statement at face value.
Do you think there are any specific criteria to be met before one is allowed to call himself an atheist; a litmus test, if you will?
I guess you must be doubting his statement or else why ask the question. So, what do you think he was prior to his conversion experience, if not an atheist? And why does it really matter?
As far as I’m concerned, its a moot point because he has make it crystal clear on what he is now (a Christian but an obnoxious and judgemental one to be sure.)
I liked him better in his atheist days :)