If you count all Stein votes for Clinton, would Clinton have won? I haven’t studied in detail for myself, but comments on the article about Pennsylvania indicate not:
“Reality Asserts Itself Dec 17, 2016
Dave Wasserman, Matthew Rozsa and Salon are simply lying about Pennsylvania.
Anyone who bothers to check the actual results will notice that Trump’s lead over Clinton there is actually 68,236 votes, while Stein’s total vote in that state is only 48,912 votes. So, even if Clinton had won both Wisconsin and Michigan, and even if every single Stein voter in Pennsylvania had voted for Clinton instead, Clinton would still have lost both Pennsylvania and the federal election. Stop lying. Lying is wrong.”
Also Johnson got more votes than Stein, and it seems to me his voters were more likely to vote Trump than Stein, so also no.
But really, the far greater issue that not enough people talk about is our RIDICULOUSLY PRIMITIVE VOTING SYSTEM! that mis-represents people’s actual wishes. Both Trump and Clinton had negative approval ratings, and it seems to me that if people were not forced into a false dilemma about which lesser evil they need to vote for, they both should’ve been disqualified. The USA deserves and actual good president, and good representatives. Our current system isn’t giving us more than a handful of actual good representatives. That’s what really sucks.