@zenvelo We can assume he is guilty be cause he admitted his guilt!
That might NOT be a true statement. As I pointed out in another thread, lawyers now days recommend that their clients plead guilty in exchange for a guaranteed lighter sentence by convincing them that they “might” go to jail for a lengthy sentence once a jury is involved. It does NOT mean that they are truly “guilty” just convinced that they “might be found” guilty unless the lawyer suddenly becomes a genius!!! I see it as lawyers being too lazy or greedy to do the actual work to get their client a “not guilty” verdict.
Cops have to be WORSE than “morally reprehensible” in order to get ANY jail time. In this case, we’ll NEVER know for sure as to WHY he didn’t get a stiffer sentence. Assuming that he’s guilty or that she had mutually agreed don’t even figure in to the equation.