@ragingloli
In this instance we are thinking of animals that have a dynamic ability to respond to changing stimuli using their limbs.
For instance, your basic earth tree would not count here, since if I go to it with an axe, despite the disparity in our sizes, I will likely fell it, whether or not it would rather I did not. If on the other hand the tree could use one of its branches to pound me into soup, we would want to know on that limb of the tree was there just the one straight lined branch with only small twigs elsewise, or was it a huge limb tipped with articulating sub branches. We’d want to know how many sub branches there were.
In the case of an octupus, there would be eight limbs, and each would count as having one digit. One could argue in this instance the octupus actually is using all its limbs as digits, which would be a vote for 8 digits. Its suckers while functional, are more of a feature on the digit, akin to a fingernail.
Even if we could imagine a species of otherwise normal humans with individual fingertips with retractable prehensile tentacles, only the digit itself would count.
For insects with tarsal claws, those would be more like fingernails, unless they could use them independently. A passive structure like elephant toes, while important, would not really count for more than one independent digit.
Hope you see the gist there.