I don’t think she has gone from being poet laureate. She hasn’t exited that role.
Not that it’s right to mistreat anyone or to make assumptions based on their apparent race, gender, or whatever. But I don’t think being poet laureate has anything to do with the matter at all.
If we survive the conservative attack on democracy, Amanda Gorman’s performance will be remembered as equal to the Gettysburg address in beauty and importance in American history.
@elbanditoroso I don’t think the issue has anything to do with that except to say she was in a position of prominence and now was racially targeted. Like Henry Louis Gates some years ago being stopped from going into his own house.
@elbanditoroso, the title of poet laureate has an ancient and venerable tradition behind it. It’s unbecoming to treat everything older than we are as necessarily worthless or obsolete. I happen to think it speaks well of us to honor some things we have inherited honestly.
Neither @Zenvelo. What an odd comment to make.
I question it because it created a sensation. I question everything that creates a sensation.
Do you believe everything you hear?
No, but your first reaction to what she said was, “I need to fact check her”. A blatant disregard for the veracity of someone’s recount of their own life.
But it had nothing whatsoever to do with her race or gender. I don’t know the woman. I don’t know if she’s capable or prone to making stuff up for attention. It’s just a little too pat for me.
@zenvelo, “Blatant disregard” strikes me as a pretty severe condemnation for the reasonable precaution of wanting to check and verify a statement before adopting it as truth. Why would it ever be bad to look for corroboration—unless you’re in a context where questioning is tantamount to attacking the faith?