Since, according to the republican justices, unenumerated rights are not rights unless they are "deeply rooted in tradition", what aspects would count towards such an assessment?
Because clearly something being a right for almost 50 years is not enough to qualify as “deeply rooted in tradition”.
Is it 100 years? 200 years? Or is such a judgement completely arbitrary and purely “rooted” in the judge’s political beliefs?
Using Fluther
or