@Dig_Dug . With that modification of the question, I would veer towards tribalism. Most importantly. I would add that as Mimi eluded to, there is always a reason or rationalization/justification for hate. AND that “hate,” is a human construct.
Maybe in the current state of humanity, nationalism… Pride, and strict adherence to specific culture, and especially their respective religious saturation, can lead many to a sort of intolerance, and/or an unwillingness to coexist equally with others whose interests differ.
This type of thinking can parallel competition for resources.
Such behavior, is not exclusive to humans. At least, looking from the outside in.
Take lions and hyenas. If you have ever seen a lion kill a hyena, you could easily perceive that lions “hate” hyenas. In comparison to how a lion kills, to eat, versus the way it kills hyenas,(by my observation) there seems to be a distinct difference. Lions don’t even usually eat a hyena after killing them. Assuming that the lions have no level of more complex motivation other than instinct, it can be deduced that they are acting on a basic/primal strategy, of eliminating competitors to achieve success.
If we view hate through an evolutionary perspective, perhaps it is an adaptation by more complex creatures to give us the best opportunity for success by acting in a perceived beneficial way, without empathy?... Like when we train soldiers to shoot first ,reflexively, instead of thinking about it. Thus giving soldiers the likely advantage of success…
Intelligent/strategic/tactical decisions often only consider the variable of morality, if it is convenient…
If you want to dissect the sheer emotion of hate, I think it’s sadly a cousin of actions/behaviors, as most emotions lead to an almost involuntary action. That is, if we are going to give hate “emotional status” equivalent to love… Which I am inclined to, as both are emotional extremes…
So. The real depth of the question, as the op is/seems to be an empathetic observer, could be interpreted as a question of cause, and effect.