@gorillapaws Not Hypothetical, but Actual: Name one law that was ever proposed that was going to institute 10,000 new regulations all at once. When you can’t you can just admit it is a strawman argument and a foolish one at that. In the case of Milei he as stated that he is willing to put the issue of abortion, and only abortion, to the vote. That is one law, not 10,000.
Bringing up the strawman just means you know I’m right and you are trying to make up something completely silly, a scenario that never has and likely never will occur to try making your argument reasonable. See the contradiction in that?
And you avoided the question of whether a Libertarian should ever put any rules into place. Because when you answer that, your own hypothetical is shot down. If you say yes, then the idea of putting something to a vote to establish laws for the society is perfectly acceptable and cannot be put into the “regulate the fuck” category. If you say no, you are saying you believe in complete mayhem with everyone doing whatever they want to do with no laws. If you say any form of maybe you are admitting that some regulations are necessary to keep from having complete mayhem. And putting one issue to a vote is not unreasonable. Of course that also shoots a hole in your idiotic supposition of one law instituting 10,000 new regulations.
Another concept is that you could just let bureaucrats establish those 10,000 new rules without any actual new laws coming into play. You know, like Democrats LOVE to do in this country? Or like they do in many Socialist and Communist countries? You know…you love those too.