@dannyc
Your prove my point about zealously opposing any belief system, regardless of its effectiveness and the degree to which those have adopted it worldwide have enjoyed prosperity and freedom, (especially relative to most other societies,)for the sake of political expediency and personal aggrandizement, yes, homosexuals are ‘special’ now, ‘untouchable’, literally and figuratively, and protected bodily and ecomonically, advanced as if they were generation of oppressed people, which, by definition, is impossible because two homosexuals cannot have children and sexual preference is just that, preference. Now it is preference for Profit. It is the degree to which homosexuals will justify their ‘special’ status and chosen lifestyle that is dangerous, as is the associations with any who will solidify this position, foreign national America Hater, or domestic America Hater. Your Clinton was a Democrat, his wife probably bi-sexual, they do not even live together, the marriage is a sham, one expects such unrepentant behavior from liberals. Strange that you would use your advocate as an example, or did Clinton not go far enough to Empower you and yours at the expence of white protestants?
Lastly, I accept my judgement, will you accept yours when the time comes? We are all accountable for our actions/behavior in this life, we will all be judged after.
@benjaminlevi
I did not say what you implied me as saying. My statement indicated that homosexuals would align themselves with any who would advance them as a group as the expense of straights, straight white protestant men in particular, for now…Adolf Hitlers rise to power was orchestrated by a homosexual man, Roehme, and many homosexual militant allies of his, they were the SSA. Same result Very likely in the US. Whites will be the primarly target, then…who knows? How is that for a supportive historical framework?