No chance, the world as a whole doesn’t exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to these “international aid and rebuilding” opportunities I see no reason for that to change here.
At the start everyone has this great need to help but the help typically amounts enormous man-hours and dollars being spent on temporary assistance, with no commitment to or structure for long-term development. Many times these huge up front numbers serve to make people think “ok, they’ve got what they need, I did my part, now back to my life” but state building (or in this case rebuilding) doesn’t work that way. When those initial dollars and efforts are burned through, and that happens quickly because at first the thought is “help at any price” not “how do we make this last, fix the problems, and build on the foundation”, there is little left to sustain the country and the stop gap solutions quickly collapse or become overwhelmed.
Add to that, most of the mind share going to help these people is temporary (overseas doctors, military, rescue workers, contractors, etc…), no one is being trained up to take the place of said people, the government is rife with corruption, and the nation is financially worth only slightly more than the dirt it’s sitting on, among many, many other problems that existed long before this quake and that’s not a good scenario for them to come out ahead.
Granted there will be good things that come out of it, but in the long run, I feel the best that can be hoped for is the people recognizing the weakness of their government in this crisis and coming together to develop stronger and more forthright national infrastructure capable of subsidizing the much needed, long term, socio-economic improvements.