So you’re saying that Planned Parenthood doesn’t kill the unborn? Or that it’s okay to kill the unborn? You must understand that I do the bulk of my Fluthering when I’m tired; you risk losing me by not being clear.
Stop baiting you? You were the one to attack me, dearie. I simply stated a fact (that PP ends lives) wrapped in some opinion (that they’re thus as bad or worse than the Klan) to say that you learn to cope. Suggesting that I should shaddap while you rag on my post makes it sound like you’ve got some double-standard issues.
No, I’m not being any kind of a revolutionary. I am being a conservative. Word choice has the power to shape perception; I’m trying to counter decades of somebody else’s wordsmithing in a much shorter timeframe, so my blows must be sharp.
I am offering you an alternate viewpoint, one that I have no reason to believe is any less valid than your own. That’s not tripe. And if you wanna talk cliched responses, you should look at that last post of yours.
Whaddaya mean, not a question to do this on? Seriously. Threads get diverted all the time and it doesn’t seem to bother anybody. This tangent exists because you (and @dpworkin, though he spared us the outraged sputtering) took issue with my asked-for-in-the-question opinion.
I am not “anti-choice”. Those are your words, yours and those of every person that would rather kill the unborn than trouble themselves with the responsibility. I believe in free will and a fair amount of self-determination for all, and that everybody ought to get a crack at life; that includes women. But it also includes children. I am Pro-Life.
The Associated Press Style Guide suggests that the terms “pro-choice,” “pro-life,” “anti-choice,” and “anti-life” are too loaded, and that for peace and sanity (and continued newspaper circulation), the terms “pro-abortion” and “anti-abortion” be used instead.