This guy is clearly without reason on his connection of a nude march & being gay, right?
Newspaper article… A nude march (topless only) was held for woman (men were welcome to join too) to represent their rights to go topless on a hot day. In the town, the law states that no genitalia can be shown, which makes it legal for woman to go topless. The real point of my question is about the conservative activist who gave the following quotes to the news. He called public nudity, “the most objectionable feature of homosexual rights marches.” And another quote is, “the promotion and presentation of public nudity is a staple of the homosexual rights movement.” Now, does this man have any ground to stand on for his statements? I don’t care if you want to be homophobic, but isn’t this just plain ignorant of a person to assume that nudity is a part of being gay? I mean, there are nude beaches everywhere, both gay & straight. Does this guy just have a major chip on his shoulder, or is there a connection between the two that I just don’t see?
Topics:
Composing members: 0
Answers
)“Great Answer”
(2)
)“Great Answer”
(3)
)“Great Answer”
(6)
)“Great Answer”
(2)
)“Great Answer”
(1)
)“Great Answer”
(1)
)“Great Answer”
(3)
)“Great Answer”
(1)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(3)
