There is another way of looking at all these gawds. Some feel they all are simple attempts to describe the same indescribable agent. A layer of the onion, or another facet of the gemstone. Not one man made gawd is capable of encompassing the essence of a being which is supposed to have created space/time itself.
Consider the term God to be like the term Government. Some feel a federal republic is more truthful. Some feel a socialist republic is more truthful. Their constitutions are their bibles. At the heart of them, is the well being of their nation. Men butcher the heart of each, and make them into something that other men grow to hate with passion.
You think it’s a bucket. But I turn it over and it becomes a stool. We refer to the same object, but we might kill each other to protect our personal usage of it. Were I to take yours away, you grow thirsty. Take mine away, and I grow weary. We’re offended if the other uses our gawd in some other way than we see fit.
Some, like myself, feel that all these different gawds are simply attempts to describe an agent that we feel exists beyond us. They all refer to the same agent. In that sense, I believe in all the gawds. Just as one might believe in both classic physics and quantum physics simultaneously. Or how one might exchange classic Darwinism for neo Darwinism.
If one believes those sciences are any different than the many gawds because they can offer real world proof, then they suggest that we know all we can know about them, and no room for further observation/description is to be tolerated.
When humans attempt to describe anything that they do not fully understand… and I mean fully understand, then they revert to poetic descriptions of that agent or phenomenon. That’s where the religion begins… the dogma. Although not as apparent, science suffers the same offense with The Pathetic Fallacy.