@SQUEEKY2 let’s get to the gist of the “threatening” tweets.
Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors.
and
….They call it “serving at the pleasure of the President.” The U.S. now has a very strong and powerful foreign policy, much different than proceeding administrations. It is called, quite simply, America First! With all of that, however, I have done FAR more for Ukraine than O.
How is that threatening? How is ANY of that a threat against Yovanovich? These are the tweets everyone is up in arms about. It is an opinion at best. And here’s the kicker: the Dems want to say this was witness intimidation. She didn’t even know they were out there until Schiff tried making something of it. Schiff is the one that had to show her the tweets while she was testifying. So if there is no reasonable way she would see them on her own, what sort of intimidation is that? No Dem/lib will really address that. All they will do is parrot the liberal talking point…the next of the desperate straws the Dems are grasping at…that Trump was trying to intimidate her and tampering with her testimony. So tell me, @SQUEEKY2, if you were going to intimidate someone, would you do it in a way that person would or wouldn’t know about it?