@Dutchess_lll Okay, we will play this game out. Here’s the comment BY YOU to which I was commenting.
“I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay,” Quigley, a Democrat from Illinois, said to close his questioning of Kent and Taylor. “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it’s certainly valid in this instance.”
Hhhmmm…I see no name associated with that. so maybe it was part of a larger conversation, right? Okay…I look back. The comment before that was:
“I’ve been very forthright…” HAHAHAHAHA!!! He got asked the same question 3 different times in 3 different ways.
Trump Jr. was wrong. This isn’t boring. It’s a comedy.
Hhhmmm…still no name. I went back further. You started putting a couple names in…you had one comment to @Jonsblond and another to @ragingloli, but those were several above and seemed directed at something they had commented. In fact, here’s a kicker, you tried shutting me down by saying you were commenting to @si3tech, but he hadn’t even commented in the thread until after the comment to which I was responding. And that response was very basic: “No” You then responded to them by assuming he was challenging what you said. Here’s a thought…and I know in your self-centered mind you cannot conceive it…maybe…JUST MAYBE… @si3tech was answering the initial question of whether he is watching or listening to the public impeachment inquiry. But you assumed he was responding to your most recent comment (which, BTW, I was).
So, Miss I-prefer-the-truth, care to retract your comment? You were W-R-O-N-G…you didn’t have a name on the comment to which I was responding. Face it, you are just afraid of me. You get frantic every time I respond to you. And I can understand because my comments usually threaten that fragile little fantasy world you have created.