Does the following quote describe mathematical evidence the election was stolen from Trump?
(N.B. The following is a quote, nothing more. I merely posted it here to be open to debate, but that’s all. I won’t consider myself responsible for what is written down below. If you consider what’s written down here mine, don’t read any further as I won’t take the blame for any inaccuracies and/or inconsistencies that might be present. If you have critics, if constructive, obviously I’ll listen to them, and maybe reply, but that’s all.)
In both Michigan and Wisconsin, several vote dumps occurred at approximately 4am on Wednesday morning, which showed that Joe Biden received almost 100 percent of the votes. President Trump was leading by hundreds of thousands of votes in both states as America went to sleep, and turnout in the state of Wisconsin seems to be particularly impossible.
The voter turnout in Wisconsin apparently annihilated the historical record of 66.8% by almost 30 percentage points.
Statistical analysts have noted that this 5-point deviation was not only a statistical improbability, but a virtual statistical impossibility.
The odds of this occurring are 0.00000189% or 1 in 52,910,052.
Some claim that this is because of same-day registration, however 20 other states allow same-day registration, and results within those states were not close to reaching a turnout this unprecedented. Additionally, it is highly dubious that hundreds of wards suddenly doubled their voter registration in a single election year.
With absentee ballots, former vice-president Joe Biden was also 60 points in Pennsylvania and almost 40 points in Michigan According to the New York Times. Comparably, Biden was only up single digits in absentee voting in most other battleground states.
Voter tallies from Michigan and Wisconsin spiked at around 6 a.m. in favor of Biden, according to graphs of live tallies posted by FiveThirtyEight (https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2020-election-results-coverage/).
Some statistically savvy observers noticed other mathematical flaws, as random numbers in statistics should follow a pattern in their distribution. (https://www.twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1324377988499210240?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1324377988499210240%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sott.net%2Fembed%2FXxN2veGNu0uEoSpWRkUyahPOGJk) (https://www.twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1325193658170134531?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1325193658170134531%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sott.net%2Fembed%2FpXT2j3aOewLlGPKd6HvPxFOyb3g)
Topics:
Composing members: 0
Answers
)“Great Answer”
(13)
)“Great Answer”
(5)
)“Great Answer”
(3)
)“Great Answer”
(16)
)“Great Answer”
(6)
)“Great Answer”
(10)
)“Great Answer”
(1)
)“Great Answer”
(3)
)“Great Answer”
(7)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(7)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(8)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(2)
)“Great Answer”
(0)
)“Great Answer”
(5)
